Nandita Anumula

Profile description

When a business partner or employer alleges that you misappropriated funds or property, the accusation of criminal breach of trust can jeopardise your reputation and freedom. In that critical moment, Nandita Anumula can construct a defence that challenges the core elements of the charge and explores every procedural safeguard.

Nandita Anumula has devoted more than thirteen years to defending clients in complex economic crimes before the Punjab and Haryana High Court and, when required, before the Supreme Court of India. The lawyer earned a law degree from the University of Delhi and a master’s specialising in white‑collar crime defence from the National Law Institute University. Early experience as a junior advocate in the Chandigarh district courts exposed the lawyer to numerous breach‑of‑trust disputes, fostering a deep understanding of the statutory nuances under Section 405 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

The offence of criminal breach of trust requires proof that the accused dishonestly misappropriated property that was entrusted. Nandita Anumula examines the trust document, the nature of the entrustment and the flow of funds to show either lack of dishonest intent or a legitimate claim over the assets. In the High Court the lawyer files a concise brief that questions the prosecution’s evidence, points out procedural gaps and cites precedents where courts acquitted defendants on the basis of a bona‑fide dispute. If the judgment is unfavorable, a criminal revision petition can be filed in the Supreme Court, arguing that the lower court misapplied the legal definition of breach of trust or ignored principles of natural justice.

The lawyer’s track record includes several landmark acquittals. In a 2021 case involving alleged misappropriation of company assets worth several crores, Nandita Anumula secured a discharge by proving that the disputed withdrawals were authorised by a board resolution and that the prosecution’s forensic audit contained calculation errors. In another recent matter, the lawyer obtained a Supreme Court stay on a conviction, where the apex court accepted that the trial court had failed to consider a settled arbitration award that nullified the alleged breach. These successes reflect the lawyer’s ability to blend financial expertise with rigorous legal argument.

Clients value the lawyer’s transparent and proactive style. The lawyer conducts an initial meeting within 24 hours of arrest, gathers all financial documents, and builds a chronology that may reveal counter‑claims, repayment schedules, or misinterpretation of authorisation clauses. The lawyer then prepares a defence dossier, drafts pre‑trial motions, and, if needed, negotiates with the prosecution for a settlement that can mitigate penalties. Throughout the process, Nandita Anumula provides regular written updates and explains the potential outcomes of a revision petition in clear, non‑technical language.

In addition to breach‑of‑trust defence, the lawyer regularly handles criminal revision matters covering sentencing errors, jurisdictional defects, and the application of punitive provisions. By filing a revision petition in the Supreme Court, the lawyer can obtain a fresh look at the High Court’s judgment, often resulting in reduced sentences or complete quashing of convictions. The lawyer stays abreast of evolving Supreme Court judgments on economic offences, ensuring that each petition reflects the latest legal standards.

If you face a criminal breach of trust charge and the Punjab and Haryana High Court has rendered a judgment, an experienced advocate who regularly assists with defence and Supreme Court revision petitions can be the decisive factor in protecting your future. Nandita Anumula offers a methodical, evidence‑driven strategy designed to challenge the prosecution’s narrative, pursue the most favourable outcome, and secure your rights at the highest judicial level.

Criminal Law Practice Areas